Gameweek 34: Risky Picks That Could Pay Off
Not every gameweek presents five obvious safe picks. Sometimes the field is split between the obvious banker that everyone backs, and a collection of uncertain options. This guide is for the rounds where you're considering something riskier — not out of recklessness, but out of strategy. Here's how to think about GW34 contrarian picks.
The KwickPicks Team has spent years running and playing Last Man Standing competitions across the Premier League, Championship, and lower leagues. We write about LMS strategy, fixture analysis, and pick advice to help players at every level survive longer — and win.
Why Risky Picks Are Sometimes the Right Call
In a Last Man Standing competition, a risky pick becomes strategically correct under two conditions: first, when you genuinely don't have a better option in your remaining team pool. Second, when the "safe" pick is so popular across the field that a loss eliminates almost everyone at once — making a different pick potentially more valuable even at lower probability.
This is important: in LMS, you're not just trying to survive — you're trying to outlast other players. If 80% of the remaining field has picked the same team and that team loses, the game may effectively be over regardless of what you picked. But if you found a different team that wins, you've now outlasted the majority of your competition in a single round. That asymmetry is powerful.
Important caveat
A risky pick is only worth considering when there is a genuine underlying reason for it — not just a desire to be different. Every pick in this guide comes with reasoning. If that reasoning doesn't apply to your specific competition and pool situation, the safe pick is still usually better.
The Relegation Six-Pointer at Home
One of the most underrated contrarian picks in late-season LMS is a relegation-threatened side hosting another team from the bottom six. The logic: the home side is desperate, their crowd is desperate, and the psychological pressure on the away team — travelling to a hostile, anxious ground — is enormous.
These fixtures, often dismissed as "too risky" by the field, actually have a surprisingly high home win rate. When survival is on the line, teams find resources they didn't know they had. A manager fighting for his job will set up to win at home in a way he simply won't in a mid-table dead rubber.
The key qualifiers: the home side must be the team with more to play for. If they're already relegated and the away side is still fighting, the calculus reverses. And the home side must have decent recent form — three wins in the last five, perhaps — to suggest they're capable of converting motivation into result.
The Newly Rejuvenated Mid-Table Side
A manager sacking followed by a new appointment is one of football's most reliable short-term form boosts. A team that appointed a new manager two or three weeks ago and has responded with back-to-back wins is in genuine momentum. Players are trying to impress, the dressing room energy is reset, and the tactical freshness catches opponents off guard.
For LMS purposes: a mid-table side at home, buoyed by a recent managerial change and two consecutive wins, against an opponent in a mid-table rut, can be a genuinely high-value contrarian pick. The field dismisses them based on league position. The reality is their current form makes them more dangerous than that position suggests.
The risk: new manager bounces don't always last, and form can be fragile. This is a pick to make with three or four weeks of evidence behind it, not one win. Two consecutive wins under a new manager at home is the target scenario.
The Away Side with a Specific Score to Settle
Normally, away picks in April are to be avoided in LMS. Away win rates in the Premier League hover around 28%, which is too low for most situations. But there are exceptions.
If a top-four side is travelling to a ground where they've historically performed well — or to a side who are now mathematically safe and showing signs of drift — the away win probability climbs meaningfully. A Champions League-chasing side on the road at a mid-table team that has nothing to play for and has lost three of their last five at home is a different proposition to a generic "away team" pick.
The additional qualifier for GW34: is the away side fully motivated? If they're locked into a specific position with nothing riding on this result, the motivation gap may not be as large as you expect. Target away picks where the visiting team has everything to gain and the home side has nothing to play for.
When to Take a Risky Pick vs Play It Safe
There's a simple framework for this decision in GW34:
Play it safe if...
- →You have a reliable Tier 1 or Tier 2 home pick available that you haven't used
- →You're in a small field (5 or fewer survivors) and elimination is catastrophic
- →The risky pick only has a slightly better contrarian argument — not a clearly better one
Consider the risky pick if...
- →Your safe options are already burned and everything left feels uncomfortable
- →The "obvious" pick has 70%+ of the field behind it and carries real rollover risk
- →You have multiple entries and can split strategies across them
- →The underlying reasoning is genuinely strong — not just "gut feeling"
The Multiple Entry Advantage
If your competition allows multiple entries and you're running two or more, GW34 is a natural round to split. Use one entry for the safe, crowd-following pick. Use another for a contrarian pick that only you — or a small minority — have backed.
If the safe pick wins, both entries survive. If the contrarian pick wins and the safe pick loses, you've survived while part of your field hasn't. This is the strategic use of multiple entries: not just doubling your chance of winning, but hedging across different probability outcomes and gaining relative advantage either way.
Read more about running a multi-entry strategy in our full strategy guide.
The Bottom Line for GW34
Risky picks in Last Man Standing are not about being clever for its own sake. They are about recognising when the standard approach — back the favourite, follow the crowd — is not the strategically optimal choice given your specific pool situation, the field size, and the distribution of picks across your competition.
In GW34, with the season drawing to a close and pools running thin, there will be rounds where the "safe" pick does not exist. In those rounds, the player who has thought carefully about contrarian value — and who can back a pick with real reasoning — is in a stronger position than the player who panics and burns their last reliable team prematurely.
Pick carefully. Survive one more week. The pot is close.
Join a competition for GW34
Public and private competitions available across all four English leagues.